Forum: KudoZ
Topic: Voters for pro/non-pro should also provide an answer or peer comment
Poster: Neil Coffey
Post title: The rationale…
[quote]writeaway wrote:
[quote]Neil Coffey wrote:
One measure that springs to mind to stop some of the backbiting might be to just assume that if a paid member posts a question, that questions is automatically PRO and cannot be voted as non-PRO.
Or are people really paying a hundred dollars a year to find out how to say “I love you” in another language…?
[/quote]
Wow. So paying members of Proz are sublimely “pro” and their questions should be pro too.
Hmm let’s see. What “qualifications” or even “translations skills” are needed to become a paying member? Oh, yes. Have a bank account, a PayPal account or even a credit card. And know how to make online payments. Definitely need to be an experienced skilled translator for that….. Paying just confirms what everyone already knows: I am a PRO!!!
[/quote]
I think the logic is more like this:
- on the whole, people who pay for a ProZ membership will be people with a “serious” interets in translation;
- on the whole, people with a “serious” interest in translation will not be posting questions of the “I love you” kind, and will have a more-than-average idea of whether a particular term could be answered by any random bilingual.
Ergo, on the whole, there are unlikely to be many grounds for calling into question a paying member’s decision about whether a particular term can be answered by any random bilingual or not.
Incidentally (and implied in what I’ve just said), I do agree that paid members should be able to deliberately classify their own question as non-PRO if they wish.
[quote]writeaway wrote:
For instance, what does a question from a pro translator look like? Well, imo, it’s one for which translators do their own research, spend time and thought on possible answers, check all possible resources and only THEN do they consider bothering fellow translators with a Kudoz question. Naturally that question is very likely a difficult one (a “pro” question) because if it were easy, it wouldn’t be asked. That IS how things work here, right? Or only “paying” members work like that….. right?
[/quote]
It’s not that ONLY paying members work like that, it’s just that by law of averages, if you take just the subset of members who have paid, the majority of that subset probably are “linguistically sensitive” enough to make the PRO/non-PRO decision. Of the other subset comprising non-paying members, I’m not saying that they are or aren’t as linguistically sensitive, I’m saying that we make no judgement about that subset of members.
(N.B. That’s strictly what this is about — it’s not actually about research skills etc.)
[Edited at 2010-09-03 20:49 GMT]
[Edited at 2010-09-03 20:50 GMT]